Author:
Bhaumik Pradip K.,Chakrabarti Alok K.,Mäkinen Saku
Abstract
PurposeDuring past ten years China and India have emerged as the favorite destination for R&D investment. In this paper a comparative evaluation of the process of technology development in China and India is carried out. The objective is to identify the rate of growth of technology and the patterns of development in different technology sectors.Design/methodology/approachThe analysis is based on the tangible, measurable and recorded output of the technology development process – namely grant of patents. The authors have used US patents as the surrogate measure for the technological output between 1992 to 2007. The authors obtained data on inventor's background, ownership pattern of the patents, as well as technology sectors and descriptive statistics are used to compare the trends between the two countries.FindingsThe paper finds that both China and India have achieved very high growth rates in patents granted with some resident research between 1992 and 2007. Both have a high percentage of foreign‐owned and low percentage of joint ownership of patents. Also, a clear polarization in the composition of research teams is detected in both China and India in that international researcher teams have largely been used only for foreign and jointly owned patents. The authors find that corporations have become much more active in recent years in patenting and multi national companies have led the local companies in patent development across many sectors. The authors also detect some significant differences in the Chinese and Indian pursuit of patent development. About 30 to 35 percent of all patents developed in China are design patents – the rest being utility patents. For India almost all such patents – more than 95 percent – are utility patents. The authors find a clear dominance along the mechanical trajectory among the patents developed in China, while for India a similar dominance is along the chemical trajectory that includes pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Another interesting finding is the growing share of ICT patents in both China and India, particularly in the last few years China has emerged ahead of India in terms of its patent development as well as in the internationalization of its patent development as reflected in the ownership of patents developed. However, even for foreign patents developed in these countries, researcher collaboration is showing a downward trend.Originality/valueThis paper carries out a comparative evaluation of the process of technology development in China and India. The analysis is based on the tangible, measurable and recorded output of the technology development process – namely grant of patents. The paper uses US patents as the surrogate measure for the technological output from China and India.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference19 articles.
1. Almeida, P. (1996), “Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the US semiconductor industry”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 155‐65.
2. Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M. (1992), “Specialization and size technological activities in industrial countries: the analysis of patent data”, Research Policy, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 79‐93.
3. Atun, R., Harvey, I. and Wild, J. (2006), “Innovation, patents and economic growth”, Imperial College, London, discussion paper 5.
4. Basberg, B.L. (1987), “Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature”, Research Policy, Vol. 16, pp. 131‐41.
5. Bhattacharyya, S. and Nath, P. (2002), “Using patent statistics as a measure of technological assertiveness: a China‐India comparison”, Current Science, Vol. 83 No. 1, pp. 23‐9.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献