Author:
Alqahtani Ayedh,Whyte Andrew
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of regression and artificial-neural-networks (ANNs) methods to estimate the running cost of building projects towards improved accuracy.
Design/methodology/approach
– A data set of 20 building projects is used to test the performance of these two (ANNs/regression) models in estimating running cost. The concept of cost-significant-items is identified as important in assisting estimation. In addition, a stepwise technique is used to eliminate insignificant factors in regression modelling. A connection weight method is applied to determine the importance of cost factors in the performance of ANNs.
Findings
– The results illustrate that the value of the coefficient of determination=99.75 per cent for ANNs model(s), with a value of 98.1 per cent utilising multiple regression (MR) model(s); second, the mean percentage error (MPE) for ANNs at a testing stage is 0.179, which is less than that of the MPE gained through MR modelling of 1.28; and third, the average accuracy is 99 per cent for ANNs model(s) and 97 per cent for MR model(s). On the basis of these results, it is concluded that an ANNs model is superior to a MR model when predicting running cost of building projects.
Research limitations/implications
– A means for continuous improvement for the performance of the models accuracy has been established; this may be further enhanced by future extended sample.
Originality/value
– This work extends the knowledge base of life-cycle estimation where ANNs method has been found to reduce preparation time consumed and increasing accuracy improvement of the cost estimation.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference38 articles.
1. Aibinu, A.A.
and
Pasco, T.
(2008), “The accuracy of pre-tender building cost estimates in Australia”,
Construction Management & Economics
, Vol. 26 No. 12, pp. 1257-1269.
2. Akintoye, A.
and
Fitzgerald, E.
(2000), “A survey of current cost estimating practices in the UK”,
Construction Management and Economics
, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 161-172.
3. Alcabes, J.
(1988), “Organizational concept for a coordinated estimating, cost control, and scheduling division”,
Cost Engineer’s Netbook
, AACE International, pp. 1-16.
4. Al-Hajj, A.N.
(1991), “Simple cost-significant models for total life-cycle costing in buildings”, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Dundee, Dundee City.
5. Alqahtani, A.
and
Whyte, A.
(2013), “Artificial neural networks incorporating cost significant items towards enhancing estimation for (life-cycle) costing of construction projects”,
Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building
, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 51-64.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献