STEM undergraduate students: library use, perceptions and GPA

Author:

Scoulas Jung MiORCID

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine if differences exist in undergraduate students' library use, perceptions and grade point average (GPA) among science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and non-STEM disciplines.Design/methodology/approachThe current study used data from the 2018 student survey. Among 2,277 students who completed the survey (response rate = 8%), only undergraduate students (n = 1,265) were selected for this study because the current study aims to examine the differences between STEM and non-STEM undergraduate students.FindingsThe findings from a Mann–Whitney U test revealed that STEM respondents perceived specific library resources (subject and course guide, library instructions and library workshops) as slightly less than non-STEM respondents. The results from ANOVA demonstrated that the mean scores in GPA for STEM respondents who never used online library, journals and databases were lower than respondents who used those library resources, regardless of STEM and non-STEM disciplines.Originality/valueRevisiting the data collected and analyzing specific user groups will be valuable to academic libraries because this study will provide academic librarians with a deeper understanding of specific user needs and perceptions of library resources and services.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference18 articles.

1. Revision of an academic library user experience survey;Performance Measurement and Metrics,2019

2. Measuring the academic impact of libraries;Portal: Libraries and the Academy,2015

3. Impact of information literacy instruction on student success: a multi-institutional investigation and analysis;Greater Western Library Alliance,2017

4. Brown, K. and Malenfant, K.J. (2018), “Documented library contributions to student learning and success: building evidence with team-based assessment in action campus projects”, in Brown, K.E., Gilchrist, D.L., Goek, S., Hinchliffe, L.J., Malenfant, K.J., Ollis, C. and Payne, A. (Eds), Shaping the Campus Conversation on Student Learning and Experience: Activating the Results of Assessment in Action, Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 79-104.

5. E-book perceptions and use in STEM and non-STEM disciplines: a comparative follow-up study;Portal: Libraries and the Academy,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3