Mixed or merged? Integration as the real challenge for mixed methods

Author:

Bazeley Pat

Abstract

Purpose Giampietro Gobo called for new methods that combine qualitative and quantitative approaches in a single instrument, suggesting this was the next challenge facing social research and mixed methods in particular. The purpose of this paper is to respond to that challenge. Design/methodology/approach An overview of methods, demonstrating their inherently mixed qualities, with special emphasis on a range of methods that can be classified as merged. Findings The real challenge is not to find merged methods, but to ensure integration of the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the methods used during the analysis and writing processes. Practical implications Researchers need to be alerted to the mixed elements within their work, to learn how to better tap into these and to exploit the integrative potential of their methods during analysis and writing. Researchers need more “rounded” methods training. Originality/value This paper refocuses the challenge facing mixed methods research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference33 articles.

1. Timeline interviews: a tool for conducting life history research;Qualitative Studies,2012

2. Anguera, M.T. and Izquierdo, C. (2006), “Methodological approaches in human communication: from complexity of perceived situation to data analysis”, in Riva, G., Anguera, M.T., Wiederhold, B.K. and Mantovani, F. (Eds), From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture Towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience, IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 207-226.

3. Are quests for a ‘culture of assessment’ mired in a ‘culture of war’ over assessment? A Q-methodological inquiry;SAGE Open,2016

4. The bricoleur with a computer: piecing together qualitative and quantitative data;Qualitative Health Research,1999

5. The evolution of a project involving an integrated analysis of structured qualitative and quantitative data: from N3 to NVivo;International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2002

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3