Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the impact of a recent innovation in the uranium market, the Global X Uranium Exchange-Traded Fund (URA), on the trading characteristics of constituent and non-constituent stocks.Design/methodology/approachThe authors analyse bid-ask spread measures, relative effective spreads and adverse selection costs to assess changes in information asymmetry among uranium stocks. The authors also study abnormal returns to assess the impact of URA on the market.FindingsOver a three-month period, following the introduction of URA, the authors find uranium stocks display decreased bid-ask spread measures, driven by reductions in information asymmetry. Relative effective spreads decrease by 36% after the introduction of URA, and adverse selection costs decline by 24% over the same period. Uranium stocks experience a significant positive abnormal return of 5.0% the day after the introduction of URA with subsequent price reversals. These suggest that the introduction of URA prompted uninformed traders to rebalance portfolios and migrate to the less information-sensitive Exchange-Traded Fund (ETF), causing temporary deviations in trading characteristics.Originality/valueThe authors demonstrate that the introduction of new financial securities to the market can have a significant impact on the trading characteristics of related equities. As URA is the only ETF in the uranium sector, the authors thereby avoid the influence of multiple ETFs that may have impacted previous studies.
Reference84 articles.
1. Smart money, dumb money, and capital market anomalies;Journal of Financial Economics,2015
2. Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread;Journal of Financial Economics,1986
3. Volatility spreads and earnings announcement returns;Journal of Banking and Finance,2014
4. Baker, P. (2017), “Are ETF inflows a bubble in the making?”, Australian Financial Review, 10 July, available at: http://www.afr.com/markets/equity-markets/are-etf-inflows-a-bubble-in-the-making-20170710-gx80ec (accessed 10 September 2017).
5. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers;Journal of Accounting Research,1968