Author:
Ehteshamfar Mohammad Vahid,Kiadarbandsari Amir,Ataee Ali,Ghozati Katayoun,Bagherkhani Mohammad Ali
Abstract
Purpose
Stereolithography (SLA) additive manufacturing (AM) technique has enabled the production of inconspicuous and aesthetically pleasing orthodontics that are also hygienic. However, the staircase effect poses a challenge to the application of invisible orthodontics in the dental industry. The purpose of this study is to implement chemical postprocessing technique by using isopropyl alcohol as a solvent to overcome this challenge.
Design/methodology/approach
Fifteen experiments were conducted using a D-optimal design to investigate the effect of different concentrations and postprocessing times on the surface roughness, material removal rate (MRR), hardness and cost of SLA dental parts required for creating a clear customized aligner, and a container was constructed for chemical treatment of these parts made from photocurable resin.
Findings
The study revealed that the chemical postprocessing technique can significantly improve the surface roughness of dental SLA parts, but improper selection of concentration and time can lead to poor surface roughness. The optimal surface roughness was achieved with a concentration of 90 and a time of 37.5. Moreover, the dental part with the lowest concentration and time (60% and 15 min, respectively) had the lowest MRR and the highest hardness. The part with the highest concentration and time required the greatest budget allocation. Finally, the results of the multiobjective optimization analysis aligned with the experimental data.
Originality/value
This paper sheds light on a previously underestimated aspect, which is the pivotal role of chemical postprocessing in mitigating the adverse impact of stair case effect. This nuanced perspective contributes to the broader discourse on AM methodologies, establishing a novel pathway for advancing the capabilities of SLA in dental application.
Reference38 articles.
1. Improving the surface roughness of SL parts using a coating and grinding process;Precis Eng,2007
2. Influence of manufacturing parameters on the mechanical properties of projection stereolithography–manufactured specimens;The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2020
3. Surface quality of 3D-printed models as a function of various printing parameters;Materials,2019
4. The effect, prediction, and optimization of Fe particles on wear behavior of Fe–ABS composites fabricated by fused deposition modeling;Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering,2023
5. Specific energy absorption during compression testing of ABS and FPU parts fabricated using LCD-SLA based 3D printer;Rapid Prototyping Journal,2022