Abstract
Purpose
Despite opposition from housebuilders, the Nationally Described Space Standard (NDSS) was introduced in 2015 amid concerns about shrinking home sizes. This paper examines Planning Appeal cases to examine how the standard has been enforced.
Design/methodology/approach
This paper considers how the NDSS has informed the regulation of housing size, based on an overview of post-2015 Planning Appeal Decisions in England where the gross internal area of the home was below the NDSS.
Findings
Appeals by developers have tended to fail where homes are “significantly” – i.e. 10% or more – below the NDSS. However, in some instances – especially where local authorities have not adopted the NDSS – the Planning Inspectorate rules considerably smaller homes “adequate”. These discrepancies appear related to (subjective) judgements about who might occupy the space, alongside consideration of layout, light and fenestration.
Originality/value
This paper is the first exploration of how the NDSS has been enforced, highlighting important contradictions in the adjudication of space standards. Many of these contradictions emerge because the NDSS is discretionary rather than mandatory, with the paper suggesting the need for clearer guidance on their application.
Subject
Law,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Urban Studies
Reference29 articles.
1. Household overcrowding and risk of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of the virus watch prospective community cohort study in England and Wales;Wellcome Open Research,2021
2. Health and safety at home;Journal of Law and Society,2007
3. Room to live? Socio-legal reflections on the UK’s politics of housing space,2016
4. Statutory overcrowding standards and England’s crisis of housing space,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献