Author:
Lin Chiahsu,Twu Chorng H.
Abstract
PurposeBased on the developed personal pleasure fashion design model (PPFDM), the authors have developed six fashion trend alternatives. The purpose of this paper is to use the fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) to select the best fashion trend alternative.Design/methodology/approachTo rationalize uncertainty associated with fuzzy, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (fuzzy AHP) is proposed in this work to calculate the weight for the criteria. The synthetic evaluation is used to calculate the score for each criterion from the best non‐fuzzy performance (BNP) values and the weight of the criterion. The scores for each criterion are summed up to rank the importance of the alternatives.FindingsThe results show that the preferred trend of the alternatives is in the order of Romantic hippy, followed by Greek goddess, then Black knight, Urban punk, Country yappy, and Sporty academy. The multiple dimension scale (MDS) is used to visualize the preferred fashion trend alternatives; it reveals that the preference image goes from romantic to urban, to country, and finally to sporty.Originality/valueThe paper offers important criteria for the selection of fashion trend alternatives. The calculation examples provide insight into the complicated fuzzy AHP and MDS methods to clarify each step in fuzzy MCDM. This study, through using MDS, uncovers that material‐oriented consumers will purchase products or brands that are congruent with their inner femininity desire to create their personal identity and self‐image. Moreover, the developed framework has proven to be useful in improving the quality of fashion design decision.
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,General Business, Management and Accounting,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference22 articles.
1. Aktuglu, Z. (2001), “A detailed study calculating the cost of preparing a collection”, Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 145‐53.
2. Belk, R.W. (1984), “Three scales to measure constructs related to materialism: reliability, validity, and relationships to measure of happiness”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, pp. 291‐7.
3. Belk, R.W. (1985), “Materialism: trait aspects of living in the material world”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 265‐80.
4. Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L.A. (1970), “Decision making in a fuzzy environment”, Management Science, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 141‐64.
5. Buckley, J.J. (1985), “Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 21‐31.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献