Children’s sensemaking of algorithms and data flows across YouTube and social media

Author:

Starks Allison,Reich Stephanie Michelle

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to explore children’s cognitions about data flows online and their understandings of algorithms, often referred to as algorithmic literacy or algorithmic folk theories, in their everyday uses of social media and YouTube. The authors focused on children ages 8 to 11, as these are the ages when most youth acquire their own device and use social media and YouTube, despite platform age requirements. Design/methodology/approach Nine focus groups with 34 socioeconomically, racially and ethnically diverse children (8–11 years) were conducted in California. Groups discussed data flows online, digital privacy, algorithms and personalization across platforms. Findings Children had several misconceptions about privacy risks, privacy policies, what kinds of data are collected about them online and how algorithms work. Older children had more complex and partially accurate theories about how algorithms determine the content they see online, compared to younger children. All children were using YouTube and/or social media despite age gates and children used few strategies to manage the flow of their personal information online. Practical implications The paper includes implications for digital and algorithmic literacy efforts, improving the design of privacy consent practices and user controls, and regulation for protecting children’s privacy online. Originality/value Research has yet to explore what socioeconomically, racially and ethnically diverse children understand about datafication and algorithms online, especially in middle childhood.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference67 articles.

1. 5Rights Foundation (2023), “Disrupted childhood: the cost of persuasive design”, available at: https://5rightsfoundation.com/in-action/disrupted-childhood-the-cost-of-persuasive-design-2023.html

2. Artificial intelligence in education: addressing ethical challenges in K‐12 settings;AI and Ethics,2022

3. Discrimination through optimization: how Facebook’s ad delivery can lead to biased outcomes;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction,2019

4. Auxier, B., Anderson, A., Perrin, A. and Turner, E. (2020), “Children’s engagement with digital devices, screen time”, [online] Pew Research Center, available at: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/07/28/childrens-engagement-with-digital-devices-screen-time/

5. Bacchi, U. (2020), “TikTok apologises for censoring LGBT+ content”, [online] Reuters, available at: www.reuters.com/article/idUSL5N2GJ459/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3