New product development in Chinese SMEs

Author:

Mu Jifeng,Peng Gang,Tan Yi

Abstract

PurposeThe importance of innovation to the performance of firms has led to numerous studies conducted to identify the critical successful factors in new product development (NPD). However, most of these studies were conducted within the context of the developed economies or for large enterprises; relatively little is known about how firms, especially small and medium‐size enterprises (SMEs), develop new products in many of the emerging markets. This paper tries to bridge the gap by examining the key success factors of NPD in Chinese SMEs. Different from the traditional approach regarding the success factors in each stage of NPD as homogeneous, the key success factors in each stage of the NPD process are examined from a managerial perspective.Design/methodology/approachThe data used in this study were collected through a multi‐stage procedure including in‐depth field interviews and surveys. Two rounds of pretests were used to refine the measurements, and the 74 questionnaires retuned in the third round were used to analyze the key success factors for NPD through score ranking and principal component analysis.FindingsChinese SMEs do not regard financial return as the primary criterion in the idea‐generation stage. Although the key success factors are relatively quite different in various stages, technological, marketing, commercial, and managerial factors are important across all stages.Research limitations/implicationsThe samples were from Beijing Incubator Alliances, which might not be representative.Practical implicationsThe results will be interesting to both researchers and managers who want to know how the Chinese SMEs develop their new products.Originality/valueVery few studies were conducted on how the Chinese SMEs develop new products, and this research contributed to this important topic. Various success factors were examined for each stage of the NPD process from a managerial perspective, rather than viewing the success factors in each stage of NPD as homogeneous, as most previous research has suggested.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference90 articles.

1. American Productivity and Quality Center (2003), Improving New Product Development Performance and Practices, American Productivity and Quality Center, Houston, TX, available at: www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/42714/.

2. Anderson, R.E. (1996), “Phased product development: friend or foe”, Business Horizon, November‐December, pp. 30‐6.

3. Anderson, A., Li, J., Harrison, R. and Robson, P. (2003), “The increasing role of small business in the Chinese economy”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 310‐6.

4. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1996), Organizational Learning: Theory, Method and Practice, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

5. Balachandra, R. and Friar, J. (1997), “Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 276‐87.

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3