Author:
Mu Jifeng,Peng Gang,Tan Yi
Abstract
PurposeThe importance of innovation to the performance of firms has led to numerous studies conducted to identify the critical successful factors in new product development (NPD). However, most of these studies were conducted within the context of the developed economies or for large enterprises; relatively little is known about how firms, especially small and medium‐size enterprises (SMEs), develop new products in many of the emerging markets. This paper tries to bridge the gap by examining the key success factors of NPD in Chinese SMEs. Different from the traditional approach regarding the success factors in each stage of NPD as homogeneous, the key success factors in each stage of the NPD process are examined from a managerial perspective.Design/methodology/approachThe data used in this study were collected through a multi‐stage procedure including in‐depth field interviews and surveys. Two rounds of pretests were used to refine the measurements, and the 74 questionnaires retuned in the third round were used to analyze the key success factors for NPD through score ranking and principal component analysis.FindingsChinese SMEs do not regard financial return as the primary criterion in the idea‐generation stage. Although the key success factors are relatively quite different in various stages, technological, marketing, commercial, and managerial factors are important across all stages.Research limitations/implicationsThe samples were from Beijing Incubator Alliances, which might not be representative.Practical implicationsThe results will be interesting to both researchers and managers who want to know how the Chinese SMEs develop their new products.Originality/valueVery few studies were conducted on how the Chinese SMEs develop new products, and this research contributed to this important topic. Various success factors were examined for each stage of the NPD process from a managerial perspective, rather than viewing the success factors in each stage of NPD as homogeneous, as most previous research has suggested.
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference90 articles.
1. American Productivity and Quality Center (2003), Improving New Product Development Performance and Practices, American Productivity and Quality Center, Houston, TX, available at: www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/42714/.
2. Anderson, R.E. (1996), “Phased product development: friend or foe”, Business Horizon, November‐December, pp. 30‐6.
3. Anderson, A., Li, J., Harrison, R. and Robson, P. (2003), “The increasing role of small business in the Chinese economy”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 310‐6.
4. Argyris, C. and Schon, D. (1996), Organizational Learning: Theory, Method and Practice, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.
5. Balachandra, R. and Friar, J. (1997), “Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 276‐87.
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献