Abstract
PurposeTextile, listed as one of the highly environmentally sensitive goods, its trade is susceptible to be influenced by the implementation of stringent environmental policies. This paper aims to investigate the long-run relationship between revealed comparative advantage (RCA) and Environmental Policy Stringency Index (EPSI) for textile exports of G20 countries in panel data setup.Design/methodology/approachApart from trend analysis, the authors have employed Pedroni and Westerlund panel cointegration method and fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) method to study the long-run relationship between RCA and EPSI in presence of cross-sectional dependence.FindingsA strong link between trade and environmental stringency is observed for textile in the present study. For G20 countries, slight evidence of the Pollution Haven Hypothesis has also been witnessed in the study. Correspondingly, the results reveal the presence of long-run association between the variables under study, implying that stringent environmental policies reduce RCA for some countries, whereas some countries witness the Porter hypothesis.Research limitations/implicationsThe results imply that policy formulation should not aim at limiting the efforts of connecting RCA to environmental stringency but to set trade policies in a wider framework, considering environmental concerns, as these are inseparable subjects. However, this study also provides relevant real-world implications that can support further research.Practical implicationsThe present study has important implications for textile exporters such as green innovations. The Porter hypothesis can be a beneficial tool for G20 exporters in enhancing their export performance, especially for the ones dealing in environmentally sensitive goods. This study offers relevant policy implications and provides directions for future research on global trade and environment nexus.Originality/valueThis study deals in a debatable area of research that evaluates the interlinkages between environmental stringency and global trade flows in the G20 countries. An important observation of the study is the asymmetrical nature of policy stringency across different countries and its impact on trade. The unavailability of updated data is the limitation of the present study.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference134 articles.
1. Evolving patterns and empirical distribution of normalized revealed comparative advantage: a SAARC countries analysis;Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research,2017
2. Environmental policy stringency, related technological change and emissions inventory in 20 OECD countries;Journal of Environmental Management,2020
3. Albrizio, S., Koźluk, T. and Zipperer, V. (2014), “Empirical evidence on the effects of environmental policy stringency on productivity growth”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No 1179, OECD Publishing.
4. The effect of agricultural total factor productivity on environmental degradation in sub-Saharan Africa;Scientific African,2021
5. Does trade openness affects global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top CO 2 emitters;Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal,2020
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献