Author:
Jackson Denise,Sibson Ruth,Riebe Linda
Abstract
Purpose
– The ability to working effectively with others (WEWO) is critical yet industry continues to lament deficiencies in new graduates. Progress in developing this highly valued skill in undergraduates is impeded by a lack of conceptual clarity and evidence of how best to measure it, and a tendency to adopt an outcomes-focused, rather than process-oriented, approach. This paper aims to investigate undergraduate perceptions of how well a stand-alone employability skill development programme, operating in an Australian Business Faculty, is fostering the WEWO skill set and which pedagogical practices are considered to add most value.
Design/methodology/approach
– The study examines undergraduate perceptions using data gathered from a skills audit of 799 business undergraduates from all four sequential units within the skills programme. Undergraduates rated and described their development against an established framework of WEWO behaviours.
Findings
– Findings indicate that, overall, skill development is rated highly among the undergraduates although the behaviours of conflict resolution, social intelligence and influencing others were rated less highly than others within the skill set. The importance of class activities and assessment items, including the use of virtual learning tools were identified by students as critical to the development of WEWO behaviours.
Originality/value
– The study highlights the important role of constructive alignment, sequential skill development, consistency of delivery and ensuring student “buy-in” to education practitioners in their efforts to meet industry expectations of graduates who can WEWO.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies
Reference56 articles.
1. Allen, J.
and
van der Velden, R.
(2005), The Role of Self-Assessment in Measuring Skill, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market, Maastricht.
2. Australian Association of Graduate Employers
(2011), 2011 AAGE Employer Survey, AAGE, Sydney, Australia.
3. Australian Learning Teaching Council
(2010), Learning and Teaching Academic Standards Project – Final Report, ALTC, Strawberry Hills, NSW.
4. Avruch, K.
and
Nan, S.
(2013), “Introduction: the constraints and opportunities of practicing conflict resolution from academic settings”, Negotiation Journal, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 205-212.
5. Barrie, S.
(2006), “Understanding what we mean by generic attributes of graduates”, Higher Education, Vol. 51 No 2, pp. 215-241.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献