Impact of social networking tools on scholarly communication: a cross-institutional study

Author:

Al-Aufi Ali,Fulton Crystal

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the extent to which social networking tools had an impact on academics’ patterns of informal scholarly communication in humanities and social science disciplines. Social networking tools, reinforced by proliferation and advances in portable computing and wireless technologies, have reshaped how information is produced, communicated and consumed. Design/methodology/approach – A cross-institutional quantitative study utilized an online questionnaire survey sent to 382 academics affiliated with humanities and social science disciplines in two different academic institutions: one that belongs to a Western tradition of scholarly communication in Ireland, and the other to a developing country in Oman. Descriptive interpretation of data compared findings from both universities. Frequencies, percentages and means were displayed in tables to enhance the meaning of collected data. Inferential analysis was also conducted to determine statistical significance. Findings – Overall findings indicate progressive use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. There is perceived usefulness on the impact of social networking tools on patterns of informal scholarly communication. However, nearly one-third of the respondents have never used social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Institution-based data comparison revealed no significant differences on data except for few activities of informal scholarly communication. Research limitations/implications – Given that the number of study subjects was eventually small (total = 382) and that academics by their very nature are disinclined to respond to online surveys, results of the study may suggest non-response errors, and these may impact negatively on the acceptability of inferences and statistical conclusions. The results of the study are, therefore, unlikely to be useful for generalization, but they remain suggestive of a growing tendency among humanities and social sciences’ academics to use social networking tools for informal scholarly communication. Originality/value – Empirical findings provide a broad understanding about the potential of social networking tools on informal scholarly communication in areas of humanities and social sciences disciplines. Multi-disciplinary investigation and qualitative studies may further deepen our understanding of the impact of social networking tools on patterns of scholarly communication.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications

Reference39 articles.

1. Al-Aufi, A. (2007), “Networked research and scholarly communication in a developing Arabic Country: an Investigation of Sultan Qaboos University, Oman”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation , Curtin University of Technology, Perth.

2. Al-Aufi, A. and Genoni, P. (2010), “An investigation of digital scholarship and disciplinary culture in Oman”, Library Hi Tech , Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 414-432.

3. Cassidy, E. , Britsch, J. , Griffin, G. , Manolovitz, T. , Shen, L. and Turney, L. (2011), “Higher education and emerging technologies: student usage, preferences, and lessons for library services”, Reference & User Services Quarterly , Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 380-391.

4. Chen, B. and Bryer, T. (2012), “Investigating instructional strategies for using social media in formal and informal learning”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning , Vol. 13 No. 1, available at: www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1027/2073 (accessed 20 September 2012).

5. Collins, E. and Hide, B. (2010), “Use and relevance of Web 2.0 resources for researchers”, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing Networked World: Transforming the Nature of Communication , Helsinki, available at: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10227/599/19collins_hide.pdf?sequence=55 (accessed 22 September 2012).

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3