Abstract
Purpose
– As patron-driven acquisition (PDA) becomes increasingly popular we must consider its impact on academic libraries and their communities of researchers. Of particular interest is how successfully e-book PDA programs serve humanities scholars, as traditional representations of their information-seeking behaviours suggest that e-books are largely unsuitable for their needs. More recent investigations into the research practices of humanists suggest that this perception is not completely accurate, making it important to assess the potential fit between PDA and the humanities based on available information. This paper seeks to address these issues.
Design/methodology/approach
– Based on published investigations into the information-seeking behaviours of humanities scholars, e-books in libraries, and e-book PDA programs the author determined ways in which e-book PDA programs intersect with the needs and practices of humanists, as well as the points of disconnect between them.
Findings
– Humanities scholars demonstrate many information-seeking behaviours that suggest they can be well-served by e-book PDA programs. Their growing acceptance of electronic resources, significant reliance on the monographic form, heavy use of library catalogues, and the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of their work mean that e-books and PDA programs can be viewed as compatible with their needs even though print remains their preferred format.
Originality/value
– While some note the number and monetary value of humanities titles purchased through PDA, no authors have assessed the nature of PDA programs in relation to the information-seeking behaviours of humanities scholars. Such analysis is necessary to get an accurate picture of how well the humanities will be served by PDA.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Computer Science Applications
Reference25 articles.
1. Adema, J.
and
Rutten, P.
(2010), “Digital monographs in the humanities and social sciences: report on user needs”, Open Access Publishing in European Networks, available at: http://bpfe.eclap.eu/eclap/axmedis/a/a61/00000-a611870b-aae2-43ee-83ad-24c5777ee6b6/2/AXMEDIS7681.pdf (accessed 8 May 2012).
2. Anderson, K.J.
,
Freeman, R.S.
,
Herubel, J-P.V.M.
,
Mykytiuk, L.J.
,
Nixon, J.M.
and
Ward, S.M.
(2002), “Buy, don't borrow: bibliographers' analysis of academic library collection development through interlibrary loan requests”, Collection Management, Vol. 27 Nos 3/4, pp. 1-10.
3. Anderson, K.J.
,
Freeman, R.S.
,
Herubel, J-P.V.M.
,
Mykytiuk, L.J.
,
Nixon, J.M.
and
Ward, S.M.
(2010), “Liberal arts books on demand: a decade of patron-driven collection development, part 1”, Collection Management, Vol. 35 Nos 3/4, pp. 125-141.
4. Barrett, A.
(2005), “The information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the humanities”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 324-331.
5. Dalton, M.S.
and
Charnigo, L.
(2004), “Historians and their information sources”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 65 No. 5, pp. 400-425.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献