A bibliometric and scientometric analysis-based review of environmental health and safety research in the construction industry

Author:

Owusu-Boadi Juliet,Kissi Ernest,Abu Ivy Maame,Owusu Cecilia Dapaah,Baiden Bernard,Debrah Caleb

Abstract

Purpose The construction business is widely recognised for its inherent complexity and dynamic nature, which stems from the nature of the job involved. The industry is often regarded as one of the most challenging industries globally in terms of implementing environmental, health and safety (EHS) practices. However, in the absence of EHS, the construction industry cannot be considered sustainable. Therefore, this study aims to identify the trends, knowledge gaps and implications of EHS research to enhance construction activities and knowledge. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a science mapping approach involving bibliometric and scientometric analysis of 407 construction EHS publications from the Scopus database with the VOSviewer software. The study is based on journal articles from the Scopus database without restriction to any time range. Findings The main focus of construction EHS research identified in the study includes sustainability-related studies, risk-related, environmental issues, EHS management, integrated management systems studies, health and safety related and EHS in the construction process. Some emerging areas also identified include productivity, design, culture, social sustainability and machine learning. The most influential and productive publication sources, countries/regions and EHS publications with the highest impact were also determined. Research limitations/implications Documents published in the Scopus database were considered for analysis because of the wider coverage of the database. Journal articles written in English language represent the inclusion criteria, whereas other documents were excluded from the analysis. The study also limited the search to articles with the engineering subject area. Practical implications The research findings will enlighten stakeholders and practitioners on the focal knowledge areas in the EHS research domain, which are vital for enhancing EHS in the industry. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this review-based study is the first attempt to internationally conduct a science mapping on extant literature in the EHS research domain through bibliometric and scientometric assessments.

Publisher

Emerald

Reference224 articles.

1. Identification of health and safety prequalification criteria for contractor selection in construction projects: a systematic review;Energies,2021

2. Health, safety and environmental (HSE) regulation and outcomes in the offshore oil and gas industry: performance review of trends in the United Kingdom continental shelf;Safety Science,2022

3. A scientometric analysis and review of construction labour productivity research;International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management,2022

4. Reducing environmental and health risks in construction projects through hazard identification and risk assessment;E3S Web of Conferences,2023

5. Aftabi, M. (2023), “Re: what is the difference between bibliometric and scientometric analyses?”, available at: www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_difference_between_Bibliometric_and_Scientometric_Analyses/642a73d980f2ea0b8b0e8d51/citation/download

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3