Abstract
Purpose
This paper’s main objective is to expand the demand-driven strategic field by developing a model where endogenization of consumers’ preferences for clean(er) products becomes the driver of the firm green corporate social responsible (GCSR) profit maximization behavior.
Design/methodology/approach
The model proposes that in undifferentiated markets, firms using a conventional technology manage production-related negative externalities via information asymmetries. In turn, when consumer socially responsible individuals (CnSR) discover the nature of the information asymmetries, they then reveal their preferences. The building block of the model is that CnSR derive value both from intrinsic as well as extrinsic product features, and derive negative satisfaction from the production negative externalities. In turn, CnSR preferences offer a higher willingness to pay for a combined intrinsic (private good and direct utility) and extrinsic (public good and feel good–do good utility) product.
Findings
The model demonstrates that the firm’s GCSR behavior is a technological-driven process directly affecting the extrinsic component of the product through the development of a safe technology, and exclusively targeting CnSR type of consumers. The corollary of the model is that for the firm pursuing a GCSR behavior, the development of a competitive advantage with higher firm performance leads to profit maximization when exclusively serving the GCSR segment of the market. Thus, GCSR is the result of unusual innovation efforts.
Originality/value
This paper presents a model that expands the field of strategic management through the demand-driven incorporation and respective modeling. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first model to explicitly develop this relationship in this format.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference61 articles.
1. A demand-based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage;Strategic Management Journal,2006
2. The market for ‘lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2006
3. Selling to socially responsible consumers: competition and the private provision of public goods;Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,2003
4. Barboza, G. and Pratt, W. (2016), “A new perspective on consumers’ preferences in the corporate social responsibility movement: the case for producer benefit experience”, Manuscript.
5. Corporate social responsibility and horizontal differentiation in imperfect competitive markets with global warming effects;Journal of Reviews for Global Economics,2013
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献