Author:
Limerick Brigid,O'Leary Jane
Abstract
PurposeTo provide examples of qualitative research based on feminist epistemological assumptions. Such research re‐invents rather than recycles management theory, producing alternative understandings which speak to the demands of managing post‐corporate workplaces characterised by growing levels of diversity and rapid discontinuous change.Design/methodology/approachReports on three feminist qualitative research projects. Describes research processes and outcomes which aim to reflexively attend to diverse voices and researcher and research participant subjectivities.FindingsProvides tangible examples of empirical feminist qualitative research, including discussions of how the research was conducted, the nature of the findings and critical reflections on the extent to which the researchers' feminist epistemological assumptions were enacted.Research limitations/implicationsThe three research projects discussed have all been conducted within the Australian education sector. Accordingly, future research could focus on providing practical examples of feminist qualitative research approaches in the management field, in different international and industrial/sector contexts.Practical implicationsProvides management researchers with three examples of feminist qualitative research covering diverse topics including leadership, mentoring and ethics.Originality/valueWhile there is a plethora of writing concerned with feminist research generally, there is a dearth of feminist research in the management field specifically. This paper's contribution therefore lies in providing tangible examples of feminist qualitative research in the management field.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference50 articles.
1. Acker, J. (1998), “The future of ‘gender and organisations’: connections and boundaries”, Gender Work and Organisation, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 195‐206.
2. Acker, J., Barry, K. and Esseveld, J. (1983), “Objectivity and truth: problems in doing feminist research”, Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 423‐35.
3. Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000), Doing Critical Management Research, Sage, London.
4. Ardovini‐Brooker, J. (2002), “Feminist epistemology: the foundation of feminist research and its distinction from traditional research”, Advancing Women in Leadership, Vol. 11 No. 1, available at: www.advancingwomen.com/awl/spring2002/ARDOV ∼ CG.HTM.
5. Arnold, V. and Davidson, M.J. (1990), “Adopt a mentor – the new way ahead for women managers?”, Women in Management Review and Abstracts, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 10‐8.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献