Priorities in integrating primary and secondary care: a multimethod study of GPs

Author:

Dunlea Shane,McCombe GeoffORCID,Broughan JohnORCID,Carroll ÁineORCID,Fawsitt Ronan,Gallagher Joe,Melin Kyle,Cullen Walter

Abstract

PurposeThroughout the world, healthcare policy has committed to delivering integrated models of care. The interface between primary–secondary care has been identified as a particularly challenging area in this regard. To that end, this study aimed to examine the issue of integrated care from general practitioners’ (GPs) perspectives in Ireland.Design/methodology/approachThis multimethod study involved a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews with GPs in the Ireland East region. A total of 1,274 GPs were identified from publicly available data as practising in the region, of whom the study team were able to identify 430 GPs with email addresses. An email invite was sent to 430 potential participants asking them to complete a 34-item online questionnaire and, for those who were willing, an in-depth interview was conducted with a member of the study team.FindingsIn total, 116 GPs completed the survey. Most GPs felt that enhancing integration between primary and secondary care in Ireland was a priority (n = 109, 93.9%). Five themes concerning the state of integrated care and initiatives to improve matters were identified from semi-structured interviews with 12 GPs.Originality/valueThe uniqueness of this study is that it uses a multimethod approach to provide insight into current GP views on the state of integrated care in Ireland, as well as their perspectives on how to improve integration within the Irish healthcare system.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)

Reference31 articles.

1. What can ‘thematic analysis’ offer health and wellbeing researchers?;International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being,2014

2. Great expectations: the implementation of integrated care and its contribution to improved outcomes for people with chronic conditions;International Journal of Integrated Care,2016

3. Does integrated care improve treatment for depression?: a systematic review;The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management,2011

4. Does integrated care reduce hospital activity for patients with chronic diseases? An umbrella review of systematic reviews;BMJ Open,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3