Author:
Parris Denise Linda,Dapko Jennifer L.,Arnold Richard Wade,Arnold Danny
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to critically review the relevant literature on transparency, provide a comprehensive definition of transparency, and present a new framework for facilitating the adoption of transparency as an ethical cornerstone and pragmatic strategy for organizational responsible business management.
Design/methodology/approach
– A systematic literature review – a methodology adopted from medical sciences to eliminate research bias – was conducted. In doing so, the definitions, antecedents, and consequences of transparency are accessed and synthesized.
Findings
– Based upon this process transparency is defined as the extent to which a stakeholder perceives an organization provides learning opportunities about itself. A conceptual framework emerged from the data. It describes when transparency is especially important, what organizations can do to be more transparent, and the potential benefits of transparency.
Practical implications
– The transparency framework can be used as a guide for organizations attempting to change their behavior, image, and performance by adopting transparency as a value in their organization. In addition, the framework can be used to create and adopt a universal (i.e. industry-wide or even societal-wide) code of conduct. Furthermore, this review, definition, and framework provide a template for academics to advance transparency theory, and empirically test the construct’s application.
Originality/value
– As a new research field, transparency has lacked a concise definition as well as a conceptual framework. This is the first comprehensive summary of transparency. In addition, this study contributes to the methodology of evaluating construct definitions to advance empirical research.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference116 articles.
1. Ahearne, M.
,
Jelinek, R.
and
Jones, E.
(2007), “Examining the effect of salesperson servicebehavior in a competitive context”,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 603-616.
2. Allen, D.
(2008), “The trouble with transparency”,
Journalism Studies
, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 323-340.
3. AMA
(2010), “Statement of ethics”, available at: www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/Statement%20of%20Ethics.aspx?s=transparency (accessed February 11, 2010).
4. Arens, L.
,
Deimel, M.
and
Theuvsen, L.
(2011), “Transparency in meat production: consumer perceptions at the point of sale”,
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B
, Vol. 1 No. 8, pp. 40-51.
5. Awaysheh, A.
and
Klassen, R.D.
(2010), “The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices”,
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
, Vol. 30 No. 12, pp. 1246-1268.
Cited by
66 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献