Exploring transparency: a new framework for responsible business management

Author:

Parris Denise Linda,Dapko Jennifer L.,Arnold Richard Wade,Arnold Danny

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to critically review the relevant literature on transparency, provide a comprehensive definition of transparency, and present a new framework for facilitating the adoption of transparency as an ethical cornerstone and pragmatic strategy for organizational responsible business management. Design/methodology/approach – A systematic literature review – a methodology adopted from medical sciences to eliminate research bias – was conducted. In doing so, the definitions, antecedents, and consequences of transparency are accessed and synthesized. Findings – Based upon this process transparency is defined as the extent to which a stakeholder perceives an organization provides learning opportunities about itself. A conceptual framework emerged from the data. It describes when transparency is especially important, what organizations can do to be more transparent, and the potential benefits of transparency. Practical implications – The transparency framework can be used as a guide for organizations attempting to change their behavior, image, and performance by adopting transparency as a value in their organization. In addition, the framework can be used to create and adopt a universal (i.e. industry-wide or even societal-wide) code of conduct. Furthermore, this review, definition, and framework provide a template for academics to advance transparency theory, and empirically test the construct’s application. Originality/value – As a new research field, transparency has lacked a concise definition as well as a conceptual framework. This is the first comprehensive summary of transparency. In addition, this study contributes to the methodology of evaluating construct definitions to advance empirical research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference116 articles.

1. Ahearne, M. , Jelinek, R. and Jones, E. (2007), “Examining the effect of salesperson servicebehavior in a competitive context”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 603-616.

2. Allen, D. (2008), “The trouble with transparency”, Journalism Studies , Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 323-340.

3. AMA (2010), “Statement of ethics”, available at: www.marketingpower.com/AboutAMA/Pages/Statement%20of%20Ethics.aspx?s=transparency (accessed February 11, 2010).

4. Arens, L. , Deimel, M. and Theuvsen, L. (2011), “Transparency in meat production: consumer perceptions at the point of sale”, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology B , Vol. 1 No. 8, pp. 40-51.

5. Awaysheh, A. and Klassen, R.D. (2010), “The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management , Vol. 30 No. 12, pp. 1246-1268.

Cited by 66 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3