Enhancing recovery orientation within mental health services: expanding the utility of values

Author:

Williams Virginia C,Deane Frank P.,Oades Lindsay G,Crowe Trevor P,Ciarrochi Joseph,Andresen Retta

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review the role of values within contemporary mental health recovery services, outlining the rationale and approach for a specific values-focused staff intervention to promote autonomously motivated uptake of recovery-oriented practices. Design/methodology/approach – Recent advances in understanding of the enduring gap between ideological and applied acceptance of personal recovery within mental health services are outlined, with particular focus on the limited utility of training programmes as a means to promoting implementation. Frequently, mental health service organisations have adopted recovery policies in a primarily “top-down” fashion standing in contrast to the high autonomy approaches espoused for service users. Drawing from the extensive research related to Self-Determination Theory (SDT), a complementary focus on “bottom-up” approaches that enable service-delivery staff to develop a sense of autonomy for changed work practices in order to increase implementation is indicated. Findings – Application of values-focused interventions for mental health recovery staff parallel to the approaches acknowledged as effective for service participants are likely to be effective in promoting implementation of newly trained recovery-oriented practices. Research limitations/implications – The paper is conceptual in nature and therefore reflects the priorities and views of the authors but the paper draws together well-established literature to develop a novel approach to a highly relevant issue. Practical implications – Training transfer and implementation of evidence-based practice are issues with broad relevance and the explication of additional methods to promote employee uptake of new practices is a key priority for organisations and policy makers. Social implications – Significant social implications include furthering the discussion and insight to the development of effective delivery of mental health services to individuals accessing service. Originality/value – A novel aspect of this paper is the provision of a theoretical rationale for the application of SDT as a framework for understanding the continuing challenge of recovery operationalisation, which despite the conceptual good-fit, currently stands as an association not well exploited. Moreover, this paper proposes values-clarification and coaching as a specific and reproducible approach to enhancing recovery-oriented service provision.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Health Policy,Education,Phychiatric Mental Health,Health(social science)

Reference54 articles.

1. American Psychiatric Association and American Association of Community Psychiatrists (2011), “Psychiatry and recovery oriented practice: a situational analysis”, available at: www.psychiatry.org/practice/professional-interests/recovery-oriented-care (accessed 10 August 2015).

2. Anthony, W.A. (2000), “A recovery-oriented service system: setting some system level standards”, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal , Vol. 24 No. 2, p. 159.

3. Australian Health Ministers (2009), Fourth National Mental Health Plan – An Agenda for Collaborative Government Action in Mental Health 2009-2014 , Australian Government, Canberra.

4. Baldwin, T.T. and Ford, J.K. (1988), “Transfer of training: a review and directions for future research”, Personnel Psychology , Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 63-105.

5. Baldwin, T.T. , Ford, J.K. and Blume, B.D. (2009), “Transfer of training 1988-2008: an updated review and agenda for future research”, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Vol. 24, pp. 41-70.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3