Accounting for the public interest: public ineffectuals or public intellectuals?

Author:

Cooper Christine

Abstract

PurposeTo present a case for accounting and finance academics to have a more active social role.Design/methodology/approachA range of published works by “public intellectuals” on praxis is presented. Each theorist could be considered to be an eminent theoretician in their own right; what marks them out is that they have developed their theories by active engagement.FindingsThe economic and political interests of the world in which academics operate are perpetuated by the creation of a breed of intellectuals who encounter significant challenges not only to questioning the status quo but, perhaps more importantly, to venturing outside of the academy. Yet, arguably there has never been a more important time for academics to do just that. Academics are armed with the necessary theoretical and research skills to bring coherence to fledgling movements and to enable them to overcome the barriers created by the myths perpetuated to hamper social protest.Originality/valueThis paper offers practical and theoretical advice to enable and encourage accounting and finance academics to enrich their work by active engagement with the social problems of the time.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting

Reference48 articles.

1. AAUP (1915), “General report of the Commission on Academic Freedom and Academic Tenure”, Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, Vol. 1, pp. 1, 26.

2. Arnold, P.J. (1998), “The limits of postmodernism in accounting history: the Decatur experience”, Accounting Organisations and Society, Vol. 23, pp. 665‐85.

3. Arnold, P.J. and Cooper, C. (1999), “A tale of two classes: the privatisation of Medway Ports”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 10, pp. 127‐52.

4. Bernhut, S. (2003), “Leader's edge: an interview with Professor John Kenneth Galbraith”, Ivey Business Journal, Vol. 68, p. 1.

5. Boltenski, L. and Chiapiello, E. (1999), Le Nouvel Esprit de Capitalism, Gallimard, Paris.

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Cultivating Campus Citizenship;Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development;2024-07-12

2. Taking the world seriously: Autonomy, reflexivity and engagement research in social and environmental accounting;Critical Perspectives on Accounting;2023-12

3. Maintaining and extending hegemony: The politics of accounting standard setting;Critical Perspectives on Accounting;2023-12

4. The emancipatory potential of counter accounting: A Žižekian critique;Critical Perspectives on Accounting;2022-08

5. Positioning Prem Sikka’s academic activism in the third space;Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal;2022-06-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3