Mechanisms for assessing food safety risk

Author:

Manning L.,Soon J.M.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to review the methods for assessing food safety risk within a food safety plan.Design/methodology/approachThe research involved analysis of both qualitative and quantitative methods of risk assessment.FindingsRisk assessment is a key element of the HACCP approach to food safety. It requires food business operators and those on HACCP teams to determine both the acceptable level of contamination and the risk for the food business, and ultimately the consumer. The choice of food safety risk assessment model is crucial to an organisation. The mechanisms to determine what is acceptable can be a combination of scientific based and value based criteria and utilise qualitative or semi‐quantitative approaches. Whilst fuzzy logic has a place in making risk assessment more quantitative; specific software tools are required to enable quantitative risk assessment especially where what is acceptable at one point could, subject to other factors later in the supply chain, change to an unacceptable level of risk to the consumer. Quantitative mechanisms are required to make these decisions at organisational, or indeed at policy level, fully transparent.Originality/valueThis research is of academic value and of value to policy makers and practitioners in the food supply chain.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference89 articles.

1. Batz, M.B., Hoffman, S.A., Krupnick, A.J., Morris, J.G., Sherman, D.M., Taylor, M.R. and Tick, J.S. (2004), “Identifying the most significant microbiological foodborne hazards to public health: a new risk ranking model”, Food Safety Research Consortium Discussion Paper Series No. 1, September, available at: www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/FRSC‐DP‐01.pdf (accessed 12 January 2010).

2. Bemrah, N., Sanaa, M., Cassin, M.H., Griffiths, M.W. and Cerf, O. (1998), “Quantitative risk assessment of human listeriosis from consumption of soft cheese made from raw milk”, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 37 Nos 1‐4, pp. 129‐45.

3. Bro‐Rasmussen, F. (1999), “Precautionary principle and/or risk assessment: a penitence in contemporary political culture”, (ESPR) – Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 188‐92.

4. BSI London (2002), “BS EN ISO 17776:2002 Petroleum and natural gas industries – Offshore production installations – Guidelines on tools and techniques for hazard identification and risk assessment”, BSI, London.

5. BSI London (2005), “BS EN ISO 22000:2005 Food Safety management systems – Requirements for any organization in the food chain”, BSI, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3