Author:
Mah Dana-Kristin,Ifenthaler Dirk
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the expectations, perceptions and role understanding of academic staff using a model of academic competencies (i.e. time management, learning skills, technology proficiency, self-monitoring and research skills).
Design/methodology/approach
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten members of academic staff at a German university. Participants’ responses to the open-ended questions were coded inductively, while responses concerning the proposed model of academic competencies were coded deductively using a priori categories.
Findings
Participating academic staff expected first-year students to be most competent in time management and in learning skills; they perceived students’ technology proficiency to be rather high but their research skills as low. Interviews indicated a mismatch between academic staff expectations and perceptions.
Practical implications
These findings may enable universities to provide support services for first-year students to help them to adjust to the demands of higher education. They may also serve as a platform to discuss how academic staff can support students to develop the required academic competencies, as well as a broader conversation about higher education pedagogy and competency assessment.
Originality/value
Little research has investigated the perspectives of academic staff concerning the academic competencies they expect of first-year students. Understanding their perspectives is crucial for improving the quality of institutions; their input into the design of effective support services is essential, as is a constructive dialogue to identify strategies to enhance student retention.
Reference56 articles.
1. Adam, S. (2013), “Studienbeginn, Studienbedingungen und Studienprobleme. Die Hochschule als ein Ort des programmierten Chaos der Massenabfertigung”, in Asdonk, J. (Ed.), Von der Schule zur Hochschule. Analysen, Konzeptionen und Gestaltungsperspektiven des Übergangs, Waxmann, Münster, pp. 231-243.
2. New evidence on college remediation;The Journal of Higher Education,2006
3. Digital badges for transparent communication of academic competencies,2017
4. Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: a qualitative comparison of two frameworks;Educational Research Review,2007
5. Learner enhanced technology: can activity analytics support understanding engagement a measurable process?;Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education,2016
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献