Author:
Alexander Matthew J.,Jaakkola Elina,Hollebeek Linda D.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to broaden extant understanding of actor engagement behavior beyond its currently dominant dyadic (micro-level) focus, by examining it from multiple levels of aggregation within a service ecosystem framework.
Design/methodology/approach
This conceptual paper draws on service-dominant logic and structuration theory as theoretical lenses to inform engagement research.
Findings
By means of a stepwise exercise of “zooming out,” the paper introduces a multi-perspective (micro-, meso-, macro- and meta-level) view of actor engagement that develops understanding of multiple engagement contexts, and suggests that balancing multiple roles may result in actor disengagement behavior. The role of reference groups and role conflict associated with balancing multiple roles is critical to understanding why engaged actor proclivities may wax and wane between contexts.
Research limitations/implications
The paper offers a set of five propositions that can be utilized by engagement scholars undertaking further research in this area.
Practical implications
Firms need to understand the values and norms embedded in diverse engagement contexts which can affect actor groups’ needs and motivations. Firms should develop appropriate organizational mechanisms to facilitate (rather than impede or obstruct) the desired behaviors of engaged actors.
Originality/value
The broader context within which engaged actors operate, and its effects on engagement, has been largely overlooked to date. By broadening the analytical perspective on engagement beyond the dyadic this paper reveals previously unaddressed aspects of this phenomenon, such as the role of disengagement behavior, and the effects of multiple engagement contexts on actors’ future behaviors.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference72 articles.
1. Roles as resources: a social roles perspective of change in value networks;Marketing Theory,2011
2. The context of experience;Journal of Service Management,2015
3. Alexander, M. and Jaakkola, E. (2016), “Customer engagement behaviours and value co-creation”, in Brodie, R.J., Hollebeek, L.D. and Conduit, J. (Eds), Customer Engagement: Contemporary Issues and Challenges, Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 3-20.
4. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument;Journal of School Psychology,2006
Cited by
195 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献