The role of manufacturers in food innovations in Sweden

Author:

Beckeman Märit,Bourlakis Michael,Olsson Annika

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate how food manufacturers in Sweden define and view innovations, how they view their role and those of other actors and the interaction/collaboration regarding innovations in the food supply/value chain.Design/methodology/approachAfter an exploratory pre‐study with 12 participants, a full study of Swedish manufacturers comprised of representatives from 12 food companies was initiated. In total, 21 interviews were carried out. The majority of the respondents had food industry experience. They initially answered structured questions and thereafter open‐ended ones.FindingsFew, if any, innovations in the Swedish food sector are considered radical. Many are “invisible” to meet demands for lower cost, shorter orders and sustainability. The food manufacturers seem to develop products in house for consumers and not by working with them or others inside or outside the supply chain; they do not adopt an “open” innovation mindset. There is lack of trust in the chain and limited exchange of information. Some manufacturers pursue horizontal collaboration with other manufacturers abroad.Research limitations/implicationsInnovations and strategies are a competitive edge for a company, so the respondents may not have been completely open.Practical implicationsManufacturers and the whole supply chain would benefit from an “open innovation” mindset to organise and work differently and build trust.Originality/valueThere is no other published study on innovations and food manufacturers in Sweden. The food sector should embark on collaboration and coopetion and initiate discussions on what can be done to become more innovative.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Food Science,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference61 articles.

1. Anselmsson, J. and Johansson, U. (2007), För‐ och nackdelar med dagligvaruhandelns egna varumärken ur konsument‐ och samhällsperspektiv, Report, Department of Business Administration, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Sweden.

2. Barringer, B.R. and Harrison, J.S. (2000), “Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships”, Journal of Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 367‐403.

3. Beckeman, M. (2006), “The rise of the Swedish food sector after WW II – what, why, how and who?”, Licentiate in Engineering thesis, Dept. of Design Sciences, Division of Packaging Logistics, Lund University, Media‐Tryck, Lund.

4. Beckeman, M. and Skjöldebrand, C. (2007), “Clusters/network promote food innovation”, Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 79 No. 4, pp. 1418‐1425.

5. Bengtsson, M. and Kock, S. (2000), “‘Coopetition’ in business networks – to cooperate and compete simultaneously”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 29, pp. 411‐426.

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3