Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine if credit rationing persists even in the era of financial liberalization, the extent to which individual, firm and loan characteristics influence the rationing behavior of commercial banks and whether the agricultural sector is discriminated against in the commercial bank credit market.
Design/methodology/approach
The study employed a probit model with marginal effects and a generalized Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition estimation on a randomly selected data of 1,239 entrepreneurs from eight commercial banks’ credit records about their individual, firm and loan characteristics.
Findings
The study revealed that credit rationing persists and that applying for a relatively longer payment period, providing collateral and guarantor, being illiterate, being relatively older and being in the agricultural sector increases the likelihood of being credit rationed, while having some relationship with the bank, having non-mandatory savings and applying from a bank with relatively high interest rates reduce the likelihood of being credit rationed. The study also revealed a credit gap of 17.77 percent and a positive discrimination against borrowers in the agricultural sector as the gap was largely being influenced by unexplained factors.
Research limitations/implications
The research was intended to cover a large number of commercial banks in Ghana. However, most of the banks were unwilling to provide such information about their borrowers; hence, the research was limited to only eight commercial banks who provided the author with the information needed for the study.
Practical implications
The study concludes that policies that enhance human capital, women, and older access to credit and agricultural-oriented financial services and others, will go a long way to reduce rationing and increase access to credit, especially to the agricultural sector.
Social implications
The research proposes the use of group lending as a form of collateral and monitoring to ease risks and default, and hence supports sustainable funding to increase access and outreach.
Originality/value
The paper looks at the comprehensive way about the various factors determining credit rationing in that it considers not only the individual, economic/firm and loan characteristics but also the extent to which discrimination toward the agricultural sector exists in the commercial banks credit market.
Subject
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Reference57 articles.
1. The Uganda rural farmers scheme: women’s accessibility to agricultural credit;Agricultural Finance Review,2006
2. Women entrepreneurs in the informal sector and their interest in accessing formal institutional credit: a study of some women entrepreneurs in two districts of the Central Region of Ghana,2003
3. Affuso, A. (2007), “Credit rationing and real assets: evidence from Italian panel data”, Economics Department Working Paper, Parker University, Dallas.
4. Women farmers’ access to credit from rural banks in Ghana;Agricultural Finance Review,2009
5. Arrow, K. (1973), “The theory of discrimination”, in Aschenfelter, O. and Rees, A. (Eds), Discrimination in Labor Markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 3-33.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献