Author:
Ziemian Sophia,Okwara Maryvivian,Ziemian Constance Wilkens
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to define the effect of specimen mesostructure on the monotonic tensile behavior and tensile-fatigue life of layered acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) components fabricated by fused deposition modeling (FDM).
Design/methodology/approach
– Tensile tests were performed on FDM dogbone specimens with four different raster orientations according to ASTM standard D638-03. Resulting ultimate tensile stresses (UTS) for each raster orientation were used to compute the maximum stress for fatigue testing, i.e. 90, 75, 60 and 50 or 45 per cent nominal values of the UTS. Multiple specimens were subjected to tension – tension fatigue cycling with stress ratio of R = 0.10 in accordance with ASTM standard D7791-12.
Findings
– Both tensile strength and fatigue performance exhibited anisotropic behavior. The longitudinal (0°) and default (+45/−45°) raster orientations performed significantly better than the diagonal (45°) or transverse (90°) orientations in regards to fatigue life, as displayed in the resulting Wohler curves.
Practical implications
– Raster orientation has a significant effect on the fatigue performance of FDM ABS components. Aligning FDM fibers along the axis of the applied stress provides improved fatigue life. If the direction of applied stresses is not expected to be constant in given application, the default raster orientation is recommended.
Originality/value
– This project provides knowledge to the limited work published on the fatigue performance of FDM ABS components. It provides S-N fatigue life results that can serve as a foundation for future work, combining experimental investigations with theoretical principles and the statistical analysis of data.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering
Reference19 articles.
1. Ahn, S.
,
Montero, M.
,
Odell, D.
,
Roundy, S.
and
Wright, P.
(2002), “Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS”,
Rapid Prototyping Journal
, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 248-257.
2. ASTM D638 – 10
. (2010), Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, available at: www.astm.org/Standards/D638.htm
3. ASTM D7791 – 12
. (2012), Standard Test Method for Uniaxial Fatigue Properties of Plastic, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, available at: www.astm.org/Standards/D7791.htm
4. Caulfield, B.
,
McHugh, P.
and
Lohfeld, S.
(2007), “Dependence of mechanical properties of polyamide components on build parameters in the SLS process”,
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
, Vol. 182 Nos 1/3, pp. 477-488.
5. Chua, C.
,
Feng, C.
,
Lee, C.
and
Ang, G.
(2005), “Rapid investment casting: direct and indirect approaches via model maker II”,
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
, Vol. 25 Nos 1/2, pp. 11-25.
Cited by
186 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献