Abstract
PurposeThis paper explored collective grief through the case of a Business Management College which suddenly and unexpectedly went into administration. The aim was to gain and apply insight to future crises in collective grief such as what occurred during Covid 19.Design/methodology/approach120 EVRE submissions with weekly reflective journal entries and 121 Capstone submissions including reflections were analysed as secondary textual data using content-thematic analysis and inferential statistics.FindingsThis study confirms the theory that grief is not linear. However, even though no positive correlation was found between two different cohorts (EVRE and CAPP submissions), who did experience the same crisis in different ways, those people did all seem to share the stage of avoidance.Research limitations/implicationsThe textual data was limited in scope as not all students chose to express their grief through the written submission or the Kubler-Ross lens.Practical implicationsThis research does suggest that initially, institutional responses to collective grief should address initial stages of “avoidance”.Social implicationsIn responding to collecting grief, such as Covid 19, institutions need to recognise the non-linear process of grief and not expect a “one-size-fits-all” approach to be a viable solution.Originality/valueThere is not much research available looking at student experience and emotional pressures (if at all) collectively during a crisis.
Subject
Education,Life-span and Life-course Studies
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献