Abstract
Purpose
This study aims to advance theory on business in conflict zones (often termed “business for peace”) so as to enable the categorization of empirical work testing the field’s assertions.
Design/methodology/approach
In this conceptual paper, the authors present an assessment framework for categorizing research on the peace impacts of business entities, as suggested by Oetzel et al. (2009). This framework allows researchers to make comparisons across methodologies and fields on whether particular business actions contribute to peace.
Findings
Drawing on peace and conflict research, this study proposes a three-stage process in response to the presence of violence and its level of intensity, identify applicable research methods to assess the impact of business actions on peace at each of the three stages and offer suggestions for future research.
Social implications
Categorizing research impacts in the business for peace field will allow societal actors to evaluate the efficacy of claimed business for peace efforts. This is particularly true for those in within international organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who work with the private sector and for those in the private sector whose work attempts to enhance peace.
Originality/value
As a societal actor, business has a key role to play in peacemaking. The past decade has seen a proliferation of qualitative research work surrounding this theme. In a seminal work, Oetzel et al. (2009) suggested a research framework building on the theories of Fort and Schipani (2004) and suggested five actions that businesses could take to promote peace. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first one to respond to that suggestion by proposing a means of categorizing the impacts of business actions.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference125 articles.
1. Persistence of power, elites, and institutions;American Economic Review,2008
2. Understanding prosperity and poverty,2012
3. Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions;Small Business Economics,2008
4. Allianz (2020), “I predict a riot”, available at: www.agcs.allianz.com/news-and-insights/expert-risk-articles/grd-political-violence.html (accessed 29 August 2020).
5. The last frontier: market creation in conflict zones, deep rural areas, and urban slums;California Management Review,2010
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献