Beyond information – factors in participation in networks of practice

Author:

Cox Andrew M.

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to explore the pattern and significance of cross‐organizational ties in an emergent professional field, web production in UK higher education.Design/methodology/approachThe research is based on in‐depth interviews with 21 practitioners and analysis of activity in cross‐organizational spaces, such as an online community and a series of annual practitioner conferences on the web in HE (1997).FindingsThe cross‐organizational spaces have support and symbolic roles as well as informational ones. They have overlapping but different membership and agendas. Key factors that govern individual participation and so the shape of cross‐organizational spaces are differential involvement in technical innovation, degree of organizational embedding or marginality, differences in organizational position and role, orientation towards centralization or decentralization and orientation towards marketing or IT. There is some sense of occupational community among web managers, but within that also diversity and a significant fracture line between marketing and IT perspectives on the role. This may explain the lack of formal professionalization. As a more natural boundary practice between organizations than marketing, IT has more public visibility, possibly influencing the course jurisdictional struggles over who should control the web.Originality/valueMost studies of knowledge sharing have focussed on the factors which influence it within an organization, yet cross‐organizational sharing is also of importance, even for established professions as the boundaries of organizations become more open. For new occupations cross‐organizational ties may be a critical resource, and not only for sharing information or support, but for making sense of what the job is about at the deepest level. The research is also original in analysing a relatively little researched occupational group, those producing web sites for a living. It will be relevant to those interested in online and people centered information seeking, in professionalization and occupational identity.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference54 articles.

1. Abbott, A. (1988), The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor, University of Chicago press, Chicago, IL.

2. Amit, V. (2002), “Reconceptualizing community”, in Amit, V. (Ed.), Realizing Community, Routledge, London, pp. 1‐20.

3. Anderson, B. (1991), Imagined Communities, 2nd ed., Verso, London.

4. Armstrong, C., Edkins, J., Lonsdale, R., Urquhart, C., Wheatley, A. and Yeoman, A. (2001), “HEINUS: higher education institutions network usage study”, available at: www.dil.aber.ac.uk/dils/research/heinus/HEINUS.pdf (accessed August 16, 2003).

5. Barley, S.R. and Kunda, G. (2004), Gurus, Hired Guns, and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3