Distributed Management as a Solution of the “Goal-Tool” Principle of Economic Policy

Author:

Sukharev O. S.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The study subject is the process of substantiation and implementation of measures of the state economic policy aimed at achieving the established priority goals of economic development from the standpoint of the “goal-tool” principle and its possible expansion. The purpose of the research is to substantiate the doctrine of so-called distributed management, which expands the use of the principle of “goal-tool” in relation to the developed and implemented economic policy, as well as to identify the main advantages, disadvantages, opportunities for its use for the public administration methods development. The content of the named doctrine comes down to identifying the structure of tools that affect the management object with a different and changing force, according to which the introduction of these tools is planned. The methodological basis was formed by the theory of management of large-scale systems, the economic policy of Tinbergen, the method of comparative analysis, and the formalization of the management process. The result boils down to identifying a significant advantage of distributed management for the formation of economic policy, since it allows to identify their correlation with the development factors, including an assessment of the strength of the applied instruments. This expands on the classic “goal-tool” principle of economic policy. Distributed management allows you to give a qualitative assessment of the institutional coordination of economic activities by the government. The use of distributed control will be most appropriate when deploying indicative planning procedures and constituting the content of the project management method, which involves the selection of a set of tools from alternative options. In the future, distributed management makes it possible to identify errors in copying managerial and organizational experience in terms of the applied development institutions, borrowed technologies, and the use of project management. A quantitative assessment of the strength of tools and its sensitivity of various goals, the application of this assessment to specific controllable systems of different levels of complexity constitutes the prospect of this theoretical study.

Publisher

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Krugman P.R. Depressions are different. In: Solow R.M., Murray J., eds. Economy for the curious: Inside the minds of 12 Nobel laureates. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014:7–18. (Russ. ed.: Krugman P. Depressii — eto nechto inoe. In: Ekonomika dlya lyuboznatel’nykh. O chem razmyshlyayut Nobelevskie laureaty. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press; 2017:24–35).

2. Smith V. L. Rethinking economics: A classical perspective. In: Solow R. M., Murray J., eds. Economy for the curious: Inside the minds of 12 Nobel laureates. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014:19–32. (Russ. ed.: Smith V. Pereosmyslenie ekonomiki: klassicheskoe ponimanie. In: Ekonomika dlya lyuboznatel’nykh. O chem razmyshlyayut Nobelevskie laureaty. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press; 2017:40–53).

3. Stiglitz J. E. People, power, and profits: Progressive capitalism for an age of discontent. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.; 2019. 366 p. (Russ. ed.: Stiglitz J. Lyudi, vlast’ i pribyl’: Progressivnyi kapitalizm v epokhu massovogo nedovol’stva. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2020. 430 p.).

4. Stigler G.J. The citizen and the state: Essays on regulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1975. 224 p. (Russ. ed.: Stigler G.J. Grazhdanin i gosudarstvo. Esse o regulirovanii. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press; 2017. 336 p.).

5. Simon H.A. The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1996. 192 p. (Russ. ed.: Simon H. Nauki ob iskusstvennom. Moscow: Editorial URSS; 2009. 144 p.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3