Author:
Sari Delia Permata,Kartika Tantri,Sapari Papang
Abstract
Money laundering crimes under the guise of investment occur a lot and it is very important to study and analyze them. Many losses arise due to money laundering practices, so efforts to prevent money laundering are needed. This study aims to analyze the Crime of Money Laundering in the Decision on Criminal Case No.395 K/Pid.Sus/2018. The type of research used is normative legal research. The charges handed down by the Public Prosecutor against the Defendant are Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Article 3 of Law No. 8 of 2010. With the decision Sentenced criminally to the Defendant therefore with imprisonment for 5 (five) years and a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000, - (one billion rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid it is replaced with imprisonment for 6 (six months).
Publisher
ELENA (Elaborium Elevasi Indonesia)
Reference13 articles.
1. Bendesa, P. (2019). Pelaku Pembiaran Tindak Pidana Narkotika dan Rekontruksi Pasal 131 UU Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 2(1), 55.
2. Berutu, A. G. (2019). Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) dalam Pandangan KUHP dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law, 2(1), 1–18.
3. Kusumadewa. (2022). Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penipuan dalam Pencucian Uang pada PT. Purnama Kertasiundo Jakarta Timur. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 3(1), 178–183.
4. Muladi. (1992). Bunga Antologi Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.
5. Nasution, A. (1998). Proses Pencucian Uang: Tinjauan terhadap Empat Variabel. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Kejahatan, 5(2), 34–47.