Intersectionality within the racial justice movement in the summer of 2020

Author:

Fisher Dana R.1ORCID,Rouse Stella M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland at College Park College of Behavioral and Social Sciences, College Park, MD 20742

Abstract

In an environment that is high in racial justice saliency, how do identities inform motivation for supporting specific issues in the crowd? This study examines the role that intersectionality played in mobilizing participants to join the mass demonstrations sparked by the murder of George Floyd. Building on recent studies that show how protest participants connect issue-based concerns with their identities to boost support for movements, we analyze data collected through surveys with a random sample of activists participating in the protests after George Floyd’s death in Washington, DC, in 2020. We find that intersectional motivations played a significant role in mobilizing protest participants. Analysis of these factors helps explain the diversity of the crowd and provides insights into how the movement may contribute to greater success for racial justice and the degree to which the movement has staying power.

Funder

Russell Sage Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference75 articles.

1. US racial inequality may be as deadly as COVID-19

2. Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland

3. L. Putnam E. Chenoweth J. Pressman The Floyd protests are the broadest in U.S. history — and are spreading to white small-town America. 1 July 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/06/06/floyd-protests-are-broadest-us-history-are-spreading-white-small-town-america.

4. L. Buchanan Q. Bui J. K. Patel Black lives matter may be the largest movement in U.S. history. 3 July 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/03/us/george-floyd-protests-crowd-size.html.

5. D. McAdam, Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ed. 2, 1982).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3