Having multiple selves helps learning agents explore and adapt in complex changing worlds

Author:

Dulberg Zack1,Dubey Rachit2ORCID,Berwian Isabel M.1,Cohen Jonathan D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

2. Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

Abstract

Satisfying a variety of conflicting needs in a changing environment is a fundamental challenge for any adaptive agent. Here, we show that designing an agent in a modular fashion as a collection of subagents, each dedicated to a separate need, powerfully enhanced the agent’s capacity to satisfy its overall needs. We used the formalism of deep reinforcement learning to investigate a biologically relevant multiobjective task: continually maintaining homeostasis of a set of physiologic variables. We then conducted simulations in a variety of environments and compared how modular agents performed relative to standard monolithic agents (i.e., agents that aimed to satisfy all needs in an integrated manner using a single aggregate measure of success). Simulations revealed that modular agents a) exhibited a form of exploration that was intrinsic and emergent rather than extrinsically imposed; b) were robust to changes in nonstationary environments, and c) scaled gracefully in their ability to maintain homeostasis as the number of conflicting objectives increased. Supporting analysis suggested that the robustness to changing environments and increasing numbers of needs were due to intrinsic exploration and efficiency of representation afforded by the modular architecture. These results suggest that the normative principles by which agents have adapted to complex changing environments may also explain why humans have long been described as consisting of “multiple selves.”

Funder

John Templeton Foundation

DOD | USN | Office of Naval Research

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference122 articles.

1. Ego Psychology and the Study of Mythology

2. R. Harré F. M. Moghaddam “Intrapersonal conflict” in Global Conflict Resolution through Positioning Analysis (Springer 2008) pp. 65–78.

3. Neural optimization: Understanding trade-offs with Pareto theory

4. A. H. Maslow “45. Conflict frustration and the theory of threat” in Contemporary Psychopathology (Harvard University Press 2013) pp. 588–594.

5. Principles of intrapersonal conflict;Brown J. S.;Conf. Res.,1957

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3