Abstract
Mandatory and voluntary mask policies may have yet unknown social and behavioral consequences related to the effectiveness of the measure, stigmatization, and perceived fairness. Serial cross-sectional data (April 14 to May 26, 2020) from nearly 7,000 German participants demonstrate that implementing a mandatory policy increased actual compliance despite moderate acceptance; mask wearing correlated positively with other protective behaviors. A preregistered experiment (n= 925) further indicates that a voluntary policy would likely lead to insufficient compliance, would be perceived as less fair, and could intensify stigmatization. A mandatory policy appears to be an effective, fair, and socially responsible solution to curb transmissions of airborne viruses.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference16 articles.
1. World Health Organization , “Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: Interim guidance, 5 June 2020” (Rep. WHO/2019-nCov/IPC_Masks/2020.4, World Health Organization, 2020).
2. Effective containment explains subexponential growth in recent confirmed COVID-19 cases in China
3. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks;Leung;Nat. Med.,2020
4. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic;Eikenberry;Infect. Dis. Model.,2020
5. Reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2
Cited by
223 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献