Abstract
Research has documented increasing partisan division and extremist positions that are more pronounced among political elites than among voters. Attention has now begun to focus on how polarization might be attenuated. We use a general model of opinion change to see if the self-reinforcing dynamics of influence and homophily may be characterized by tipping points that make reversibility problematic. The model applies to a legislative body or other small, densely connected organization, but does not assume country-specific institutional arrangements that would obscure the identification of fundamental regularities in the phase transitions. Agents in the model have initially random locations in a multidimensional issue space consisting of membership in one of two equal-sized parties and positions on 10 issues. Agents then update their issue positions by moving closer to nearby neighbors and farther from those with whom they disagree, depending on the agents’ tolerance of disagreement and strength of party identification compared to their ideological commitment to the issues. We conducted computational experiments in which we manipulated agents’ tolerance for disagreement and strength of party identification. Importantly, we also introduced exogenous shocks corresponding to events that create a shared interest against a common threat (e.g., a global pandemic). Phase diagrams of political polarization reveal difficult-to-predict transitions that can be irreversible due to asymmetric hysteresis trajectories. We conclude that future empirical research needs to pay much closer attention to the identification of tipping points and the effectiveness of possible countermeasures.
Funder
National Science Foundation
DOD | United States Army | RDECOM | Army Research Office
Rensselaer-IBM AI Research Collaboration
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference29 articles.
1. D. B. Truman , The Governmental Process (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1951).
2. Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion
3. P. E. Converse , “The nature of belief systems in mass publics” in Ideology and Discontent, D. E. Apter, Ed. (Free Press, New York, 1964), pp. 206–261.
4. Why do liberals drink lattes?;DellaPosta;AJS,2015
5. Does voter polarisation induce party extremism? The moderating role of abstention;Dreyer;West Eur. Polit.,2019
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献