Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans

Author:

Pink Sophia L.,Chu JamesORCID,Druckman James N.ORCID,Rand David G.,Willer RobbORCID

Abstract

Overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic requires motivating the vast majority of Americans to get vaccinated. However, vaccination rates have become politically polarized, and a substantial proportion of Republicans have remained vaccine hesitant for months. Here, we explore how endorsements by party elites affect Republicans’ COVID-19 vaccination intentions and attitudes. In a preregistered survey experiment (n = 1,480), we varied whether self-identified Republicans saw endorsements of the vaccine from prominent Republicans (including video of a speech by former President Donald Trump), from the Democratic Party (including video of a speech by President Joseph Biden), or a neutral control condition including no endorsements. Unvaccinated Republicans who were exposed to the Republican elite endorsement reported 7.0% higher vaccination intentions than those who viewed the Democratic elite endorsement and 5.7% higher than those in the neutral control condition. These effects were statistically mediated by participants’ reports of how much they thought Republican politicians would want them to get vaccinated. We also found evidence of backlash effects against Democratic elites: Republicans who viewed the Democratic elite endorsement reported they would be significantly less likely to encourage others to vaccinate and had more negative attitudes toward the vaccine, compared with those who viewed the Republican elite endorsement or the neutral control. These results demonstrate the relative advantage of cues from Republican elites—and the risks of messaging from Democrats currently in power—for promoting vaccination among the largest vaccine-hesitant subgroup in the United States.

Funder

SU | School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford University

Stanford Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference8 articles.

1. S. Franiere , N. Weiland , For Biden, a new virus dilemma: How to handle a looming glut of vaccine. The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/26/us/biden-coronavirus-vaccine.html (March 26, 2021).

2. "Coronavirus: Vaccinations" in Civiqs. (June 2, 2021). https://civiqs.com/results/coronavirus_vaccine (Accessed 2 June 2021).

3. J. Bullock , “Party cues” in The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, E. Suhay , B. Grofman , A. H. Trechsel , Eds. (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 2020), pp. 129–150.

4. How Political Parties Shape Public Opinion in the Real World

5. Beliefs About COVID-19 in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Novel Test of Political Polarization and Motivated Reasoning

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3