Abstract
We describe two interdisciplinary projects in which natural scientists and engineers, as well as psychologists and other behavioral scientists, worked together to better communicate about climate change, including mitigation and impacts. One project focused on understanding and informing public perceptions of an emerging technology to capture and sequester carbon dioxide from coal-fired power plants, as well as other low-carbon electricity-generation technologies. A second project focused on public understanding about carbon dioxide’s residence time in the atmosphere. In both projects, we applied the mental-models approach, which aims to design effective communications by using insights from interdisciplinary teams of experts and mental models elicited from intended audience members. In addition to summarizing our findings, we discuss the process of interdisciplinary collaboration that we pursued in framing and completing both projects. We conclude by describing what we think we have learned about the conditions that supported our ongoing interdisciplinary collaborations.
Funder
Electric Power Research Institute
National Science Foundation
Riksbankens Jubileumsfond
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference53 articles.
1. The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment or flaws in how we study judgment?;Dawes;Organ Behav Hum Decis Process,2004
2. Klein G (1999) Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
3. Gigerenzer G Todd PM The ABC Group (2000) Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart (Oxford Univ Press, Cary, NC).
4. Eliciting probabilistic expectations: Collaborations between psychologists and economists
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献