Affiliation:
1. Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 N.W. Marine Drive, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z1
2. Sociology Department, University of Maryland, College Park
Abstract
Abstract
We used metropolitan-level data from the 2000 U.S. census to analyze the hypersegregation of four groups from whites: blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and Native Americans. While blacks were hypersegregated in 29 metropolitan areas and Hispanics were hypersegregated in 2, Asians and Native Americans were not hypersegregated in any. There were declines in the number of metropolitan areas with black hypersegregation, although levels of segregation experienced by blacks remained significantly higher than those of the other groups, even after a number of factors were controlled. Indeed, although socioeconomic differences among the groups explain some of the difference in residential patterns more generally, they have little association with hypersegregation in particular, indicating the overarching salience of race in shaping residential patterns in these highly divided metropolitan areas.
Reference33 articles.
1. White Ethnic Neighborhoods and Assimilation: The Greater New York Region, 1980–1990.;Alba;Social Forces,1997
2. Socioeconomic Status and Racial Residential Segregation: Blacks and Hispanics in Chicago;Darden;International Journal of Comparative Sociology,1987
3. Black Residential Segregation in the City and Suburbs of Detroit: Does Socioeconomic Status Matter?;Darden;Journal of Urban Affairs,2000
4. Are African Americans Still Hypersegregated?;Denton,1994
5. Changes in the Segregation of Whites From Blacks During the 1980s: Small Steps Toward a More Integrated Society;Farley;American Sociological Review,1994
Cited by
252 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献