Abstract
summary: From the early 1950s to the early 1970s, international nutritionists considered childhood protein malnutrition the world's most serious public health threat. By 1974, many believed that this "protein gap" had been exaggerated. Two questions remain: why protein, and why this period? Four converging developments created a network that maintained protein's "charisma": new food technology, a growing international health infrastructure, the nominal demise of eugenics, and new geopolitical priorities in a world shaped by both the Cold War and decolonization struggles. A transnational network of nutrition experts argued that protein deficiencies could explain bodily and population differences that would have, in an earlier era, been attributed to race or inheritance. Protein malnutrition could help explain "backward" economies and cultures, they claimed, and protein supplementation would help spur development. The protein gap theory thus framed difference in the language of modernization theory, but left intact older hierarchies of bodies, nations, and races.