Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the dispute resolution procedure by the EAEU Court in the context of creating a single information space of the member countries of this integration association. Within the framework of the theoretical and practical orientation of this study, special attention is paid to conceptual problems related to the description of key social and digital phenomena that arise in the process of implementing the digital agenda and its impact on the judicial method of protecting the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and business entities. The transition to digital or electronic justice will increase the efficiency of the EAEU Court and create the most attractive conditions for the parties to the dispute to protect their rights and legitimate interests. Digitalization provides for large-scale changes in the field of justice, the emergence of new means of proof, the introduction of an electronic form of cases, remote court sessions all this leads to a change in the fundamental principles of legal proceedings. The solution to this problem should begin with the creation of a comprehensive program of legislative changes to the judicial method of protecting rights related to their digital transformation within the EAEU.
Publisher
Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khacatur Abovyan
Reference19 articles.
1. Baishev, Zh. N. (2019). Sud Yevraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: problemy funktsionirovaniya (The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: Challenges of functioning, in Russian). Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN (Proceedings of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, in Russian), 14(1), 57-75. Moscow. Retrieved from http://igpran.ru/trudy/vypuski/2019/ISL_2019_01.pdf?ysclid=lm652uilmm948596648
2. Chaika, K. L., & Savenkov, A. N. (2018). Problemnyye voprosy v praktike Suda Yevraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza (Problematic issues in the practice of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union, in Russian). Gosudarstvo i pravo (State and Law, in Russian), 10, 5-22.
3. Dyachenko, E. B. (2020). Sudebnyy aktivizm i yego rol' v praktike mezhdunarodnykh sudov (Judicial activism and its role in the practice of international courts, in Russian). Mezhdunarodnoye pravosudiye (International Justice, in Russian), 2(34), 103-125.
4. Entin, K. V. (2022). Obshchiye printsipy prava integratsionnykh ob"yedineniy kak sekretnoye oruzhiye Suda ES i Suda EAES (General principles of the law of integration associations as a secret weapon of the Court of the EU and the Court of the EAEU, in Russian). Mezhdunarodnoye pravosudiye (International Justice, in Russian), 2, 64-83.
5. Entin, M. L., Entina, E. G., & Galushko, D. V. (2022). Cost of exclusion, a new measure of platform dominance. In M. Inozemtsev, E. Sidorenko, Z. Khisamova (Eds.), The platform economy: Designing a supranational legal framework (pp. 315-330). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-3242-7_22