Abstract
Abstract
While dislike of opposing parties, that is, affective polarization, is a defining feature of contemporary politics, research on this topic largely centers on the United States. We introduce an approach that analyzes affective polarization between pairs of parties, bridging the US two-party system and multiparty systems in other democracies. Analyzing survey data from twenty Western democracies since the mid-1990s, first, we show that partisans' dislike of out-parties is linked to elite policy disagreements on economic issues and, increasingly over time, also to cultural issues. Secondly, we argue and empirically demonstrate that governing coalition partners in parliamentary democracies display much warmer feelings toward each other than we would expect based on elite policy (dis)agreements. Third, we show that radical right parties are disliked much more intensely than we would expect based on policy disputes and coalition arrangements. These findings highlight the policy-based and institutional underpinnings of affective polarization.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference73 articles.
1. Why Washington Won't Work
2. Follow the Leader?
3. Populism as a Problem of Social Integration
4. The way we were: how histories of co-governance alleviate partisan hostility;Horne;Comparative Political Studies,2022
5. Social divides in the age of globalization
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Political Stigma and Preference Falsification: Theory and Observational Evidence;The Journal of Politics;2024-10-01
2. Second phase: The activation stage;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
3. First phase: The latency equilibrium;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
4. Reported vote: An observational measure of political stigma;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02
5. Dedication;The Normalization of the Radical Right;2024-09-02