Author:
Meinke Deborah K.,Thomson Keith Stewart
Abstract
Teeth and other dermal skeletal elements from three osteolepid and two eusthenopterid rhipidistians were examined with the scanning electron microscope to establish whether the hypermineralized outer layer was enameloid or enamel. Using Smith's (1978) morphological criteria to infer the developmental history of enamel and enameloid, enamel was found in the teeth and dermal bones of the osteolepids, whereas enameloid was identified in scales. Hyneria and Eusthenopteron teeth also had enamel. As enamel has also been found in teeth of living lungfishes and extant Latimeria, the presence of enamel in tetrapod teeth represents a primitive character retained from a lobe-finned ancestor and is not useful for phylogenetic studies within the lobe-finned/tetrapod group. Shellis and Miles' (1974) hypothesis that the transition from enameloid to enamel occurred via a fairly simple regulatory change is discussed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Paleontology,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference39 articles.
1. Comparative study of the ontogenetic and phylogenetic development of dental enamel;Kvam;Norske Tandlaegefor. Tid. Suppl.,1946
2. Meinke D. K. in press. A review of cosmine: its structure, development, and relationship to other forms of the dermal skeleton in osteichthyans.
3. Autoradiographic study of the formation of enameloid and dentine matrices in teleost fishes using tritiated amino acids
4. On the biology of cosmine;Thomson;Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist.,1975
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献