Structural intervention at one bridge decreases the overall jumping suicide rate in Victoria, Australia

Author:

Dwyer J.,Spittal M. J.ORCID,Scurrah K.,Pirkis J.ORCID,Bugeja L.,Clapperton A.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Aims There is clear evidence that installing safety barriers is effective in preventing jumping suicides from high-risk bridges with only moderate displacement to other nearby bridges. However, the impact of barriers on jumping suicides across broader geographical areas is not well understood. We examined patterns in jumping suicides across the state of Victoria, Australia, after a safety barrier was installed at the West Gate Bridge which, before the installation of the barrier, was the site of approximately 40% of Victoria’s jumping suicides. Methods We used negative binomial regression analyses on Victorian data from 2000 to 2019 to compare rates of jumping suicides at the West Gate Bridge, other bridges and non-bridge jumping locations before, during and after the West Gate Bridge barrier installation. We conducted linear regression analyses to examine whether the distance travelled from the deceased’s usual residence to the location of their jumping suicide changed between the before, during and after barrier installation periods. Results After installation of the barrier, there were no jumping suicides at the West Gate Bridge (rate ratio [RR] = 0.00, 95% credible intervals [95% Cr] = 0.00–0.0001) and there was strong evidence that the rate of jumping suicides at all locations declined by 65% (RR = 0.35, 95% Cr = 0.22–0.54). At other bridges, there was also evidence of a reduction (RR = 0.31, 95% Cr = 0.11–0.70), but there was no evidence of a change at non-bridge locations (RR = 0.74, 95% Cr = 0.39–1.30). Conclusion After installation of the safety barrier at the West Gate Bridge, jumping suicide in Victoria decreased overall and at other bridges, and did not appear to change at non-bridge locations. Our findings show that when barriers are installed at a site responsible for a disproportionately high number of jumping suicides, they are not only highly effective at the site where the barriers are installed but can also have a prevention impact beyond the immediate locale at similar sites.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Epidemiology

Reference28 articles.

1. Do local landmark bridges increase the suicide rate? An alternative test of the likely effect of means restriction at suicide-jumping sites

2. Suicide prevention by limiting access to methods: A review of theory and practice

3. Ironside, R (2012) Brisbane city council snub bridge safety barriers in wake of murder-suicide of Jason Lees and son. The Courier Mail . https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/council-rejected-cage-call/news-story/aa37db67d4e9c5e57a9d8e65c122e1ae (accessed 20 July 2023 ).

4. Jamieson, A (2012) Inquest into the death of Allem Halkic. Coroners Court of Victoria COR 2009 0655. https://www.coronerscourt.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-12/allemhalkic_065509.pdf (accessed 12 March 2021 ).

5. Restricting access to a suicide hotspot does not shift the problem to another location. An experiment of two river bridges in Brisbane, Australia

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Restriction of access to means used for suicide;The Lancet Public Health;2024-09

2. High-Risk Suicide Locations in Australia;JAMA Network Open;2024-06-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3