Author:
Bradley Clara,Weatherall James Owen
Abstract
AbstractWe argue that several apparently distinct responses to the hole argument, all invoking formal or mathematical considerations, should be viewed as a unified “mathematical response.” We then consider and rebut two prominent critiques of the mathematical response before reflecting on what is ultimately at issue in this literature.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Counterparts, Determinism, and the Hole Argument;The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;2024-02-01
2. Some Remarks on Recent Formalist Responses to the Hole Argument;Foundations of Physics;2023-12-11
3. Between a Stone and a Hausdorff Space;The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;2023-11-29
4. The Hole Argument and Beyond: Part I: The Story so Far;Journal of Physics: Conference Series;2023-06-01
5. Reopening the Hole Argument;Philosophy of Physics;2023