Abstract
AbstractThe article discusses three liberal arguments about freedom of movement: immigration as a remedy for global injustice in the distribution of opportunities, freedom of movement as an integral aspect of individual autonomy, and immigration control as implied in democratic self-determination and citizenship. The article shows how these apparently irreconcilable stances can be reconstructed as partially overlapping once we realize that liberal citizenship provides not only reasons for closure but entails a bundle of mobility rights and is open for access by migrant stakeholders.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference53 articles.
1. Wadensjö Eskil , 2007. “Migration to Sweden from the New EU Member States”, IZA Discussion Papers n° 3190 (Bonn, IZA).
2. Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders
Cited by
57 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献