Abstract
AbstractConcrete is regarded as a quintessentially Roman achievement. The spread of the technology is usually dated to the fourth or third centuriesb.c., and interpreted as a symptom of Rome's early expansion in Italy. In this paper I offer a reappraisal of the available evidence for early concrete construction in Rome. On the basis of stratigraphic evidence, I conclude that a later date should be assigned to most of the remains. I situate the origins of the technological innovation within the radical change in architectural styles that unfolded in the middle of the second centuryb.c., affecting both domestic architecture and public building. The new chronology has an impact on current models of cultural diffusion in Roman Italy, linking the development of Late Republican architecture with the broader debate on the cultural implications of the Roman conquest.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Archaeology,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,History,Archaeology,Classics
Reference170 articles.
1. Zanker P. 2000: ‘The city as a symbol. Rome and the creation of an urban image’, in Romanization and the City. Creation, Transformations, and Failures. Proceedings of a Conference held at the American Academy in Rome, 14–16 May 1998, Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series 38, Portsmouth, RI, 25–41
2. Roman imperialism, globalization and Romanization in early Roman Italy. Research questions in archaeology and ancient history
3. Concrete Vaulted Construction in Imperial Rome
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献