Abstract
Abstract
We study why suffering a negative economic shock, i.e., a significant loss, may trigger a change in other-regarding behavior. We conjecture that people trade off concern for money with a conditional preference to follow social norms and that suffering a shock makes extrinsic motivation more salient, leading to more norm violation. This hypothesis is grounded on the premise that preferences are norm-dependent. We study this question experimentally: after administering losses on the earnings from a real-effort task, we analyze choices in prosocial and antisocial settings. To derive our predictions, we elicit social norms for each context analyzed in the experiments. We find evidence that shock increases deviations from norms.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference79 articles.
1. Sacrifice: An experiment on the political economy of extreme intergroup punishment;Eckel;Journal of Economic Psychology,2022
2. An economic understanding of populism: A conceptual framework of the demand and the supply side of populism;Benczes;Political Studies Review,2023
3. Do negative random shocks affect trust and trustworthiness?;Bejarano;Southern Economic Journal,2018
4. oTree – An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments;Chen;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance,2016
5. Norms, preferences, and conditional behavior;Bicchieri;Politics,Philosophy and Economics,2010
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献