Abstract
Abstract
Social scripts, like A gives a compliment, B says ‘thank you’, pervade and shape natural language discourse and social interactions. Scripts usually promote cooperation between conversational participants, but not always. For example, if A pays B a ‘compliment’ like ‘nice legs’, A puts B in a double bind of either abiding by the compliment script by saying ‘thank you’ and being humiliated, or breaking the script and risking escalation. In this paper, I take a philosophical lens to the notion of a social script. I give a theoretical overview of what it would mean to disrupt a social script and explain why and when it is prudential to do so. Then I give several examples of disruptions of social scripts. This essay makes four key contributions to the philosophical literature on social scripts: (1) it introduces a new distinction between interpersonal and structural scripts; (2) it illuminates how interpersonal social scripts can be pernicious by creating a double bind; (3) it analyzes what it is to disrupt a social script; and (4) in doing so, it challenges the orthodoxy about the relationship between cooperation and disruption in political action.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference87 articles.
1. Beyond Binary: Genderqueer as Critical Social Kind;Dembroff;Philosophers’ Imprint,,2020
2. Street Smut: Gender, Media, and the Legal Power Dynamics of Street Harassment, or “Hey Sexy” and other Ejaculations;Laniya;Columbia Journal of Gender and Law,,2005
3. Reformulating Sexual Script Theory
4. Heterosexual Privilege: The Political and the Personal
5. “Throw Like a Girl” Doesn’t Mean What It Used To: Research on Gender, Language, and Power
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献