Author:
Young John,Brown Alex,Forster Anne,Clare Josie
Abstract
‘When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean’. So it is with rehabilitation, except that several definitions and explanations have been proposed. Although the similarities between the definitions are considerable and far eclipse any differences, the perceived diversity of view has contributed to confusion over the purpose and process of rehabilitation. Is it ‘elderly care’? Is it ‘therapy’? Is it ‘post-acute’ care? The apparent ambiguity and the intangible qualities of rehabilitation contrast with the concrete ‘ologies’ of contemporary organ-based medicine and contribute to its vulnerability in our modern general hospitals. Pressures caused by rising emergency admissions and cost-driven bed closures have necessitated steadily reducing lengths of stay and rehabilitation, as a less visible component of care, has tended to be squeezed out. Paradoxically, the consequences of the ‘sicker and quicker’ discharge approach, with fresh burdens placed on community health and social services, have drawn attention to rehabilitation as a missing ingredient. We have now entered a phase of rediscovering at a strategic policy level the rehabilitation needs of older people but redefined in new terminology as ‘recuperation’ or ‘recovery’ This article will describe the core concepts of rehabilitation for older people and set the scene for forthcoming articles addressing specific rehabilitation topics.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献